Another Tiananmen?

Some say the Chinese government would nip any potential mass political protest in the bud.
By Parameswaran Ponnudurai
2011.06.03
A pro-democracy march calling for justice for Tiananmen Square crackdown victims in Hong Kong, May 29, 2011.
AFP

If tens of thousands of Chinese protesters flocked to Tiananmen Square today to demand pro-democracy reforms, would the military send in tanks and crush the revolt like they did in June 1989?

The question is not likely to arise at all as the wary Chinese authorities have been swift at nipping in the bud any political protests that could balloon to a million strong as seen in the heart of Beijing then, experts say.

Even so, the leadership of the ruling Chinese Communist Party will not hesitate to unleash its full military might if demonstrations do go out of control, rights groups said on the 22nd anniversary of the June 4 Tiananmen Square crackdown on student-led protests.

Two decades after the massacre, Beijing has refused to account for the killings of the hundreds gunned down by the military or to bring the perpetrators to justice.

Its treatment of dissent also has little changed.

"It's not simply Tiananmen. We have seen a consistent pattern of the (Chinese) government acting forcefully to prevent the emergence of any organized political movement," Stapleton Roy, a former U.S. ambassador to China, said in an interview.

He said "special circumstances"—such as divisions within the party leadership and the allowing of students to demonstrate for several months—permitted the Tiananmen protests to gain momentum at that time.

"I don't think there is any possibility that the authorities today would permit something like that to repeat itself," said Roy, who became envoy in Beijing two years after the bloody event that shocked the world and was condemned by most governments.

Memories

china-tiananmen-slogan-400.gif
A Chinese worker expresses support for protests at Tiananmen Square, May 17, 1989, before the government's bloody crackdown.
AFP

Human rights groups today need not jolt their memories about the Tiananmen crackdown. The worst quelling of dissent since the 1989 clampdown is occurring now in the world's most populous nation, they say.

Since mid-February, Chinese authorities have intensified a crackdown on a large number of Chinese religious leaders, artists, lawyers and bloggers following online calls for a "Jasmine" revolution inspired by recent uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East.

Up to 200 of them have been subjected to measures ranging from police summonses to house arrest, dozens have been detained on criminal charges and at least 20 others have been the victims of enforced disappearance.

"The current leaders of the Chinese Communist Party have instituted the most severe repression of dissent and activism since the post-Tiananmen crackdown," said the Chinese Human Rights Defenders activist network based in Hong Kong.

Reports from individuals who have been detained or disappeared in recent months indicate that "torture and mistreatment have been routine, as police seek to pressure these individuals to abandon their human rights activism or keep silent about their treatment during detention," the group said.

The government has also tightened Internet censorship, forced several liberal newspaper editors to step down, and imposed new restrictions on foreign media reporting in Beijing.

"Heavy-handed responses"

The ongoing crackdown and the "heavy-handed" responses to protests in the restive Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia regions "show the government is no more willing than it was two decades ago to peacefully resolve popular discontent," said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch.

The Chinese government's refusal to take responsibility for the Tiananmen massacre also "laid the foundation for the state impunity behind the current crackdown on dissent," Human Rights Watch said.

For 22 years, it said, the Chinese authorities had covered up the bloody event and even persecuted survivors, victims' relatives, and those who challenged the government's narrative of the incident.

"There is little reason to believe the lethal response to peaceful protests in 1989 could not happen again," Richardson warned.

So at what point will the Chinese leadership, which tolerates practically no open defiance of its authority, move forcefully to contain any future protests?  

It depends on the nature of the protest, said Minxin Pei, a China expert at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Beijing tolerates certain forms of protest, such as an April truckers' strike at port facilities in Shanghai, but represses others, like the actions of Ai Weiwei, an arrested celebrity artist and political activist, who has been a thorn on the side of the communist leadership, he said.

"As a rule, a frontal challenge to the authority of the Chinese Communist Party, as Ai’s activities embodied, practically guarantees a harsh response from the government," Pei said in a recent report in The Diplomat, a current-affairs magazine for the Asia-Pacific region.

"But protest inspired by specific economic grievances, such as truckers’ ire over excessive fees (levied on them), seems to fare better," he said.

"In the eyes of the ruling party, the former constitutes an existential threat and so no concessions are seen as able to appease political activists rejecting the very legitimacy of the regime," Pei said.

Differences in protests

Ex-US envoy Roy agrees.

"We have to differentiate between spontaneous protests over injustice, over taxation, over levying of tolls that people believe are illegal, things of this sort, and efforts to form political linkages like those that could challenge the rule of the communist party," he said.

Still, Roy does not sense a mood in China for a repetition of a Tiananmen-like confrontation.

"In watching the sentiment, both in China and among the reformers who left China following the Tiananmen incident, the consensus as I have been able to read it was that it was a mistake to push the demonstrations as far as as they did and that it set back the cause of reform."

POST A COMMENT

Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.