Pro-Democracy Party Slams Communist Party 'Brainwashing' in Hong Kong Textbooks

china-zhingzhi-hongkong-textbooks-aug24-2018.jpg Members of the Hong Kong pro-democracy party Demosisto hold copies of newly published school textbooks backed by the Chinese government, which they say are 'biased' and aimed at 'brainwashing' students, at a press conference in Hong Kong, Aug. 24, 2018.

A pro-democracy party in Hong Kong has hit out at newly published school textbooks backed by the Chinese government as "biased," and aimed at "brainwashing" students.

The books and teaching materials published by Educational Publishing, which is wholly controlled by Beijing's Central Liaison Office in the city, contain a biased account of the 2014 pro-democracy Occupy Central movement, according to activists who led the movement.

The account of the 79-day civil disobedience movement for fully democratic elections offers only quotes from four opponents and relegates movement co-founder and Hong Kong University law professor Benny Tai to the status of "supporter."

The group said that even textbooks not published by the company had begun using terminology that is approved by the ruling Chinese Communist Party to describe the histories of Hong Kong and China.

According to Demosisto committee member Isaac Cheng, a history textbook published by Marshall Cavendish describes Hong Kong as being "occupied" during British colonial rule.

He said the 1919 student-led May 4th movement protesting against the Chinese government's weak response to the Treaty of Versailles that handed territory in the eastern province of Shandong to Japan had been misrepresented.

"For example, there is a sentence added in at the end which describes the May 4th movement as a patriotic movement close to Chinese people's hearts, but makes no mention of the emphasis in the May 4th movement on fighting for democracy and westernization," Cheng told RFA.

"This is a deliberate bid to cater to the government view [of the era] and to stir up students' emotions," he said.

Elsewhere, Cheng said, a General Studies text refers to the British colonial era that ended with the 1997 handover to China as an "occupation."

"They refer to the period of British rule as one of British occupation, which is exactly the same as Chinese officials insisting that China never gave up sovereignty over Hong Kong," he said.

Hong Kong Island was ceded in perpetuity to Britain by the Qing dynasty (1644-1911) after the First Opium War (1839–1842).

The Kowloon peninsula was added to the colony after the Second Opium War (1856–1860), while the New Territories were added under a 99-year lease that expired in 1997, when Hong Kong was handed back in its entirety to become a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.

Under the terms of the handover treaty, the city was promised the continuation of its existing freedoms for at least 50 years.

But recent interventions by Beijing in the political and cultural life of the city, including edicts from the National People's Congress that resulted in the disqualification of sitting lawmakers and potential election candidates, have led many to conclude that those freedoms are likely a thing of the past.

‘This isn’t transparent’

Demosisto also called on schoolteachers to alert them to any more phrases they think are biased.

Council Front lawmaker Au Nok-hin agreed with the party's assessment of the textbooks.

"Everyone can see that certain textbooks and teaching materials within our education system contain political judgements, and that this isn't transparent," Au told reporters on Friday.

"We call on the education department to make public the names of those who were on the curriculum drafting committee, and whether or not they are sufficiently qualified to be reviewing teaching materials," he said.

High-school history teacher Johnny Siu said Chinese government propaganda is beginning to make its way into teaching materials across the whole curriculum in recent years.

"Even the most basic primary school materials have started to get red-washed, and they don't really need much analysis at that foundational level," he said.

"These are only very small modifications to the wording, but they are constantly changing," Siu said. "After a further two years' worth of revision after revision, the situation will be very serious."

"I think this is a slow, incremental and pervasive attempt at brainwashing ... they won't even need to implement 'national patriotic education' because it has already gotten into the textbooks," he said.

‘Anti-brainwashing’ campaign

In 2012, proposals for patriotic education in Hong Kong's schools were shelved after thousands of protesters camped outside government headquarters for several weeks, dressed in black and chanting for the withdrawal from the curriculum of what they called "brainwashing" propaganda from the Communist Party.

Student activist Joshua Wong and his Scholarism group, which spearheaded the "anti-brainwashing" campaign, went on to play a key role in the Occupy Central democracy movement two years later.

Demosisto was founded in April 2016 by three former leaders of Occupy Central: Joshua Wong, Nathan Law, and Agnes Chow.

Law returned just five months later as the youngest-ever member of Hong Kong's Legislative Council (LegCo), but was later stripped of his seat after Beijing intervened with a ruling on the validity of oaths of allegiance made by him and five other pro-democracy lawmakers.

Chow, also a veteran of the Scholarism movement, was debarred by election officials from standing in the 2018 Hong Kong Island by-election, for advocating self-determination for the city, in a move that was widely condemned as a threat to the city's political life.

Reported by Lam Kwok-lap for RFA's Cantonese Service. Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie.


Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.