Hundreds of Police Deployed Along Myanmar Students’ Protest Route

Email story
Comment on this story
Print story
Myanmar students march in Mandalay, Jan. 20, 2015.
Myanmar students march in Mandalay, Jan. 20, 2015.

Around 200 Myanmar security personnel have been deployed along a route used by students marching in protest of a controversial education law they say will limit academic freedoms, drawing concerns from sympathetic residents, sources said Thursday.

The students from Mandalay, who have been marching to Yangon since January, arrived in Magway region’s Taungdwingyi township Thursday as part of protests calling for amendments to the National Education Law, passed last September.

They are expected to reach the area’s Satthwar village tomorrow, where the security personnel will be waiting for them, said resident Zaw Min Tun.

“[The security forces] have been here for about two nights now and nearly all of them have stationed themselves near the pagoda compound—everyone from the area can see them,” he told RFA’s Myanmar Service.

“The people in the village are starting to wonder what is going on and what might happen. We have formed an emergency committee to help with all of the needs of the students and for their security as well.”

Students in Myanmar, a former British colony also known as Burma that is emerging gradually from decades of military rule and isolation, are viewed with wariness by the government because they have often spearheaded movements for political and social change.

Staff at the Satthwar police station declined to comment on the buildup of security personnel in the village, though the Mandalay column had been temporarily joined by 800 residents on its march to Taungdwingyi after leaders gave a speech at a local university, according to the Irrawaddy online journal.

The Mandalay column was one of the few student protest groups that had not suspended its march to Yangon ahead of planned four-party talks on the education law with the government, lawmakers and the Network for National Education Reform (NNER), an organization consisting of educational, political and religious groups.

The students are protesting the legislation’s centralized control of the curriculum, ban of student and teacher unions, and lack of education spending increases.

Several other protest columns from around the country have resumed their marches to the commercial capital Yangon following the government’s decision to postpone the talks on Tuesday—the day they were due to commence—until after Union Day on Feb. 12.

Government representatives had prevented support staff and media from accompanying students and NNER members to the negotiations venue in the capital Naypyidaw, saying there was not enough room in the meeting hall, sources told RFA.

The government had also claimed to be preoccupied with Union Day events and questioned whether a student delegation summoned to the capital Naypyidaw was representative of wider sentiment among the marchers.

Monywa column

Also on Thursday, Wai Moe Naing, president of the Monywa University Students' Union in Saigaing division said his 200-student column had reached Pakokku in Magway region where it would join with others to continue its march.

“The students from Pakokku and other cities close by, such as Magway, Yenangyaung and Chauk [all in Magway region] have made contact and will be combining to make up the Pakokku protest column,” said Wai Moe Naing, who also represents the Action Committee for Democratic Education, a 15-member student alliance.

“Our Monywa protest column will combine with the Pakokku column and then march from Pakokku through Chauk, Yenangyaung, Magway, Pyay [in Bago region] and finally to Yangon,” he said.

The combined columns plan to hold a protest rally in town for three days before proceeding to Yangon, the Irrawaddy reported.

The journal said that a group of students in Dawei, in Tanintharyi region, had planned a protest march on Thursday, while demonstrators in Rakhine and Mon states had announced plans to begin protests within a week.

The Irrawaddy Boycott Students’ Column, which began its march from Irrawaddy region’s Pathein city on Feb. 3, was greeted by more than 3,000 residents of Kyaunggon township on Wednesday and had planned to reach Pantanaw city a day later.

Voicing their difficulties

Chief minister of Irrawaddy region Thein Aung met with parents of students taking part in the Irrawaddy Boycott Students’ Column on Thursday in Pathein and urged them to persuade their children to end the march, a mother named San San Htay told RFA.

“He said that he can only be responsible for [preventing a crackdown on the] students within Irrawaddy region,” she said.

San San Htay said the protests began at a time when the students wanted to voice their difficulties and problems.

“That is why they joined the march … not because someone had incited them or manipulated them into doing so,” she said.

“I told [Thein Aung] that they went along with the march because they really wanted to express what they felt inside their hearts.”

After arriving in Pantanaw, the Irrawaddy Boycott Students’ Column plans to proceed to Nyaungdon, Maubin, Pyapon and Dedaye townships in Irrawaddy before joining the main boycott column from Mandalay in Yangon.

Reported by Khin Pyisone, Ma Zarni Tun and Ma San Maw Aung for RFA’s Myanmar Service. Translated by Soe Thinn. Written in English by Joshua Lipes.

Comments (1)


from USA

Thousands of students protested the Burmese government to encourage reform through an education law passed years ago. The Burmese educational system is still recovering from decades of neglect under the military rule that has curbed academic independence and freedom. Student protesters (and non-students) want to see the National Education Bill voted to become law. And they want to form a student union and create a commission to oversee the country’s education system. Also, in the state of Mon, students will be holding a protest on February 9th in Moulmein. They are demanding student rights, one of which is for ethnic native language instruction to be recognized under the Burmese national education law.
Why doesn’t the government want to include improving these important conditions in education in it’s public policy?
It is because the Burmese educational system crippled a generation of students. For example, every student has to pass all subjects on the first try to continue in school, otherwise they have to repeat all of the subjects for that one year. Most students do not pass all of the subjects, and they usually quit school completely. In the US, if a student does not pass a subject, he or she can retake only that one subject to pass class and continue on into the next year.
Countries engaged in poor educational public policy will have less educated citizen’s than countries that have a good policy. The poor policy has a negative effect on the citizens. In the past, the citizens in Burma had the opportunity to study abroad and the educational system was as good as the American educational system. In 1962, after the Burmese military, led by General Ne Win, seized state power, only the military personnel had the opportunity to study abroad and the Burmese educational system concentrates on the military’s government policy and socialism, neglecting democracy and freedom. After a new Burmese military seized state power in 1988, the Burmese education system became so poor that students only needed to attend the University for two years to gain a B.A or B.Sc degree. This was because the Burmese military leaders were worried that educated students would oppose them.
I conducted a survey of OSU undergraduate seniors by asking 1000 of them (1/2 men and ½ women from all over the world) if they thought that their high school preparation for college work was adequate. I also asked their ages, socio-economic level and the name of the country in which they received their high school degree. I found that there was a high correlation between Burmese respondent students who felt inadequately prepared (they only take 10 years of school before entering college) and low grades. American students who must take 12 years of pre-college classes before entering college, had better grades and responded that they felt more prepared for college classes than did the Burmese students who took 2 years less of pre-college classes. This has high internal validity and also could be considered to have high external validity because it showed that it can be generalized to other students attending colleges from all over the world who may not have done as extensive college preparatory work as American students. In other words, this survey would probably be valid if given to any undergraduate college seniors at any college in the world. The study also showed, in a similar manner, that Indian students had better college grades at American colleges than did American students because of the more rigorous secondary educational system and parental involvement in India than in America. However, this result might be diminished by the fact that superior grades in Indian students studying in America might be due to the student “selection process” that selects better students in the qualifying process to come to America.

Feb 08, 2015 10:58 PM





More Listening Options

View Full Site