Myanmar Military Frees 13 Villagers Caught in Rakhine Conflict

myanmar-freed-villagers-military-rakhine-state-jan14-2019.jpg Thirteen villagers detained by Myanmar soldiers, but later released, stand with other area residents outside the Arakan National Party office in Buthidaung township, western Myanmar's Rakhine state, Jan. 14, 2019.
Photo courtesy of Arakan National Party-Buthidaung

Myanmar’s military on Monday freed all but two of 15 villagers suspected of contact with rebel forces after detaining them for a day in Buthidaung township amid fighting between government soldiers and insurgent Arakan Army troops in restive northern Rakhine state, a national lawmaker said Tuesday.

The 13 who were released said soldiers questioned them about possible connections to the Arakan Army (AA) and asked if they were supplying food to soldiers, Maung Kyaw Zan, a legislator in the upper house of parliament, told RFA’s Myanmar Service.

Seven of the men are from Buithdaung’s Pyin Chaung village, two are from Apautwa village in Kyauktaw township, one is from Kyauktaw’s Naypukhan village, and the rest are travelers, he said.

The soldiers have not freed Maung Than Hlaing, head of Pyin Chaung village, or resident Maung Kyaw Win and have charged them under Section 17 (1) and (2) of Myanmar’s Unlawful Associations Act at Buthidaung township court, Maung Kyaw Zan said.

A resident of Thayatpyin village who was detained for an explosion in Buthidaung on Dec. 30 was also charged under Section 17 (1) and (2) and sent to jail in the township, he said.

Rights groups say Myanmar authorities use the act mainly to intimidate and arrest political activists and members of ethnic minorities, thereby posing a threat to freedom of association in the developing democracy.

Section (1) of the act carries a three-year prison sentence for those who are members of or interact with an unlawful association, such as an ethnic armed group, while Section (2) carries a five-year term for assisting such an organization.

In addition, two villagers who were taken by soldiers during fighting on Monday between the AA and government army have not returned home, and their mobile phones are turned off, their family members told RFA.

Hostilities between the two armies have intensified in Buthidaung since Jan. 4 when the AA, a Rakhine Buddhist military force that wants greater autonomy in the state, carried out coordinated attacks on four police outposts near Myanmar’s border with Bangladesh, killing 13 policemen and injuring nine others.

Government army troops had been conducting clearance operations in the area amid a new round of hostilities that began in late November 2018.

The clashes, which have included the use of heavy weapons and helicopters by the Myanmar Army, have driven more than 5,000 civilians from their homes. Government military authorities have restricted displaced civilians' access to food supplies.

On Tuesday, Myanmar officials postponed a planned visit by United Nations refugee chief Filippo Grandi to Rakhine state on account of fresh hostilities between security forces and the AA, Agence France-Press reported.

Before the uptick in fighting, northern Rakhine state was rocked by a brutal military crackdown on Rohingya Muslims following deadly attacks on police outposts by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) militant group in August 2017. More than 725,000 Rohingya fled to safety in neighboring Bangladesh during the campaign of violence.

Myanmar soldiers stand guard as air force helicopters arrive at the airport in Sittwe, capital of western Myanmar's Rakhine state, Oct. 13, 2016.
Myanmar soldiers stand guard as air force helicopters arrive at the airport in Sittwe, capital of western Myanmar's Rakhine state, Oct. 13, 2016.
Credit: AFP
‘No restrictions on helicopters’

When asked about the use of helicopters in the fighting, Myanmar military spokesman Colonel Zaw Min Tun told RFA that government forces are conducting a counter-insurgency campaign against the AA, not a civil war.

Government spokesman Zaw Htay told a news conference on Jan. 7 that the President’s Office ordered the army to supply more troops to the area and if necessary use helicopters in military campaigns against the AA, which he said had links to ARSA, even though the latter purports to speak only for Muslim Rohingyas.

The order sparked criticism against the military as well as against State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar’s de factor leader, as a violation of international law and human rights.

But Zaw Htay defended the decision by noting that both Myanmar and international practice have permitted the use of the aircraft in counter-insurgency campaigns.

“There’s no restriction on the use of helicopters in domestic conflict,” he said.

AA spokesman Khine Thukha accused the government army’s air campaign of harming civilians.

“The excessive use of force will dishonor [the military],’ he said. “The bombing campaign actually harms local residents. Bombing civilians is a crime against humanity.”

Khine Thukha also dismissed the army’s term “insurgent” to describe the AA, and said the military is the force acting as an insurgent.

Others expressed mixed reactions to the Myanmar’s Army’s use of the helicopters in battle.

“Helicopters and advanced weapons shouldn’t be used, because this is a domestic conflict, not one against a foreign adversary,” said Naw Zipporah Sein, an ethnic Karen political activist and former vice president of the Karen National Union.

“That will hamper peace efforts in the country and cause a loss of public confidence,” she said.

Myanmar human rights lawyer Aung Htoo also questioned the helicopters’ use.

“There’s no indication of a terror organization at all, and under such circumstances, the government’s use of air support is against international practice.”

Yu Lwin Aung, a member of the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission, disagreed.

“Things like people fleeing and having no access to health care and education relate to human rights issues,” he said. “But you can’t say for sure that every use of helicopters violates human rights.”

Confederation is ‘unrealistic’

Also on Tuesday, the leader of the Institute for Strategy and Policy (ISP), a Myanmar think tank, said the AA’s dream of obtaining confederate status for Rakhine state is unrealistic.

Min Zin, ISP’s founding member and executive director, told reporters in Yangon that additional armed conflicts would arise in Rakhine state if the AA makes this its political objective.

“If the AA talks about a confederation of states with the intention of leveraging the organization, the AA and government can maintain their discussions,” he said. “But if AA considers this confederation issue as a political dream or vision or expectation for Rakhine, it will be difficult for us to have peace, and there will be more conflicts.”

Min Zin was commenting on a statement that AA commander-in-chief Brigadier General Tun Myat Naing made to the online journal The Irrawaddy that the rebel force prefers a confederation of states such as that of Wa state — an unrecognized state located in eastern Myanmar divided into northern and southern regions which are separated from one another and administered by the United Wa State Army — rather than a federal state that the government is striving for.

Tun Myat Naing said this would give the AA a larger share of power in line with the country’s constitution, and that a confederation is “better” than federalism.

The AA is one of seven ethnic armed groups belonging to the Federal Political Negotiation and Consultative Committee (FPNCC) that has proposed a confederate system in Myanmar that allows ethnic organizations to maintain their own armed forces.

Min Zin also urged the ruling civilian-led National League for Democracy government to cooperate with the national army instead of trying to limit or reduce the powers granted to it by the 2008 constitution, drafted by a military junta that previously ruled the country.

“If the government tries to hold a meeting [with the national military] only when a problem occurs, such as the AA’s attack in Rakhine, it can only expect a reactive response from the military,” he said.

“If the government wants mutual respect and cooperation from military, then it must give priority to working with the military in parliament or in the state’s emergency and security meetings.”

Reported by Min Thein Aung, Htet Arkar, and Aung Theinkha for RFA’s Myanmar Service. Translated by Nandar Chann and Khet Mar. Written in English by Roseanne Gerin.

Add comment

Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.

View Full Site